The myth of “superpowers” is evaporating and the evidence is the open battle fronts in the world policy

aljazeera.net
4 Min Read


It seems that the international scene is going through a moment of power exposure, while the great powers thought that moving their fleets or signing agreements would be enough to resolve the conflicts in which they participated, because their end was decided in their favor.

A report in the British newspaper “The Guardian” came to put the dots on the great powers’ resolution of conflicts in their favor. The conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran have proven that the countries that have the right to decide the beginning no longer necessarily have the luxury of shaping the end according to their whims, which explains the faltering diplomatic paths in most international conflicts, despite the American weight.

Read also

list of 2 itemsend of list

This international deficit collided with a new field reality in Beirut. Lebanon, which was intended to be a secondary front at the beginning of the conflict, has turned, according to a report in the New York Times, into “the biggest obstacle” threatening the survival of any agreement between Washington and Tehran to end the war.

The article clearly indicated that the US-Iranian agreement faces a real test in the Beirut suburbs and its south, where regional stability has become a hostage to the developments of this front, which is no longer a subsidiary, but is now the real knot of the saw.

Consensus is that real differences have come to the surface for the first time between an American president, Trump, and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu (Reuters)
Consensus is that real differences have come to the surface for the first time between an American president, Trump, and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu (Reuters)

Israel and loss of control

Internally in Tel Aviv, concern is no longer limited to missiles, but rather extends to decision-making power. The French “Le Monde” monitored a state of strategic confusion and growing anxiety, as the Hebrew media began to promote the idea that Israel has lost full control over its policy towards Lebanon under direct pressure from Washington, amid fears that the Israeli forces stationed in southern Lebanon will be more vulnerable to being targeted the longer they remain.

Politically, Benjamin Netanyahu finds himself in his weakest link; According to the newspaper “Haaretz”, the decline in the popularity of “Likud” is no longer the only concern of the Prime Minister of Israel. Rather, the decline in public support from his favorite ally, Donald Trump, constituted a fatal blow to his position.

Today, Netanyahu faces a pincer of pressure between embarrassing American statements and deepening international isolation ahead of the elections.

At the street level, it seems that confidence in the American ally has reached its lowest levels. Figures reported by Bloomberg showed that 71% of Israelis believe that Washington may sacrifice their security interests on the altar of the agreement with Iran.



Source link

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *