Question and answer: How does Netanyahu exploit the region’s wars to impose a new reality in Gaza? | policy

While the attention of the international community turns to the southern Lebanon front or awaits a renewed confrontation between Israel and Iran, the Israeli occupation army continues to deepen the wounds Gaza Strip Through a strategy of bloody and disruptive field escalation.

This suspicious coincidence raises questions about the feasibility of international guarantees and the extent of the Israeli Prime Minister’s exploitation Benjamin Netanyahu -What is required to the International Criminal Court– The curtain of regional wars to impose a new reality in Gaza, which was dismantled by experts and analysts in an episode of the “Beyond the News” program.

How does Israel benefit from the regional tension in the Gaza file politically and militarily?

Palestinian writer and political analyst Iyad Al-Qara believes that Israel is pursuing a policy of “emptying the agreements of their content,” taking advantage of the global preoccupation with the Iranian file, describing the current Israeli behavior as a “freezing process” aimed at keeping the situation on the ground as it is for as long as possible, allowing it to control about 50% of the Gaza Strip’s area and turn it into buffer zones.

Al-Qara explains that this freeze aims militarily to exhaust the Palestinians and prevent the popular support and resistance from breathing, while politically it aims to deprive Iran or any regional parties of using the “Gaza card” as a maneuver in the larger regional conflict.

From the occupation’s point of view, keeping Gaza stifled and isolated ensures that it will not turn into an effective front within the unity of the arenas in any comprehensive confrontation.

Why does Israel repeat its violations despite the truce in effect?

And about the reasons for the recurrence of daily violations and massacres despite the validity of… Ceasefire agreement according to US President Donald Trump’s planThe expert on Israeli affairs, Muhammad Halsa, attributed the reasons to the political convenience of the occupation in Gaza.

Tel Aviv – says Halsa – is not paying a real price for its crimes in the Gaza Strip, and the relationship with Washington is accepted and has not been subjected to protocol criticism, in addition to the silence of the countries guarantoring the agreement.

He adds that Gaza has turned into a “compensatory arena” for Netanyahu. Whenever it becomes difficult for him to achieve absolute victory in Lebanon or Iran, he returns to escalating the death machine in Gaza to satisfy his partners on the extreme right, such as the right-wing Israeli politician. Bezalel SmotrichAnd to bridge the gap with internal public opinion by showing the army the upper hand.

Palestinian analyst Iyad Al-Qara also pointed out the danger of “disruption of international standards.” The international community no longer denounces the limited killings that occur daily in the Gaza Strip, as if it has become an “acceptable matter” compared to major massacres, which gives the occupation a green light to continue to exhaust the Gaza Strip.

On Wednesday evening, 5 Palestinians – including 3 children – were martyred and others were seriously injured following a raid launched by an Israeli occupation drone that targeted a group of citizens near a mosque in the Mashrou’ area. Beit Lahia Northern Gaza Strip.

On April 14, the government media office in Gaza reported that Israel had committed 2,400 violations of the ceasefire agreement since it entered into force on October 10, including killing, arrest, siege, and starvation.

Since then, violations have resulted in the death of 786 Palestinians and the injury of 2,217, according to the Ministry of Health in Gaza.

Why was Trump’s plan not completed and the National Committee for Gaza Administration not involved?

Regarding implementation failure The second stage Regarding Trump’s plan to enter stabilization forces or administrative committees into the Strip, former US State Department official Thomas Warrick considered that Gaza is receiving less attention in Washington as a result of the war with Iran and the situation in Lebanon.

Warrick believes that the current American approach (under the expected Trump administration or current policies) makes any progress in Gaza contingent on the disarmament of the Islamic Resistance Movement (agitation), which he considered a condition that hinders any progress, especially with Hamas’ rejection of it, in addition to its failure to hand over power to the National Committee or agree to the conditions for disarmament, which Washington sees as a precondition for the entry of any international stability forces.

The American official said that this trend gives the impression that the political solution in Gaza has been placed in the “refrigerator” until further notice, and has become linked to the results of the confrontation with Iran.

On the other hand, Palestinian political analyst Iyad Al-Qara spoke about the great flexibility shown by Hamas during its recent meetings in Cairo to discuss the mechanisms for implementing the stages of the agreement, and actually moving towards implementing the second stage.

Al-Qara also pointed out the “important strategic decision” that Hamas announced and conveyed to the mediators, which is its true desire to stop the war and not return to it in any way, as this decision aims to remove the pretexts from the hands of Netanyahu, who is trying to portray the resistance as a party that rejects the solution.

Al-Qara explains that Israel uses the “advanced death machine,” field control, and starvation of the displaced as tools of blackmail on the Palestinian street to push the resistance toward absolute surrender, that is, complete disarmament.

The Palestinian option – as the speaker believes – aims at field and political steadfastness to prove that the Israeli “freeze” strategy will not achieve its security goals, and that stability in the region cannot pass through the gate of suffocation of the Gaza Strip.